(Partial) Movie Review: Deadgirl

The promotional poster for Deadgirl. (Very tasteful... Oh, wait...NOT TASTEFUL AT ALL!)

When confronted with a zombie, most movie characters seem to have one of the following reactions:

  • Run screaming in cowardly terror
  • Barricade oneself in a mall, funeral home, or abandoned mine
  • Pull out the M-16 and start shooting

However, the new zombie film Deadgirl (not to be confused with the 2006 film The Dead Girl) seeks to add another.  Namely:

  • Commit rape

Seriously.  This film is about a group of high school boys who find an attractive female zombie in the basement of an abandoned hospital and decide to rape it.  There’s more, of course, but I think we can stop right here and examine this premise.

Few things are more sensational than zombies, but rape is one of them.  And the more sensational content will always have primacy when a film is discussed or described.  (For example, if you made a movie about zombies who go deep-sea fishing, I think it’s fair to say it would be described as “A zombie movie with deep-sea fishing” because zombies are more sensational than deep-sea fishing.  But almost nothing is more sensational or upsetting than rape.  Thus, with Deadgirl I’m hard pressed to call it “A zombie movie.”  Instead, “A rape movie with a zombie” feels more appropriate.)  Certainly, Deadgirl is not the first zombie film to portray or imply rape (the 2006 British film The Zombie Diaries comes to mind).  Yet I can think of no zombie film exclusively devoted to it. 

For all its sensationalism, I’d be hard pressed to recommend Deadgirl.  I didn’t feel it wove a compelling story around likable characters.  I didn’t know who to “cheer for” (the zombie?).  And if the filmmaker meant to provide a damning indictment of human-nature, I think he failed by incorporating supernatural elements. It was astonishing to see a film with this shocking premise and content, but in the end, it was a colonnade and not an entire building.  There wasn’t much there after you got past the basic scenario. 

To be clear, it is possible to tell a great story about characters who are 100% evil, and who perpetrate (or suffer) horrible things.  (“The Pardoner’s Tale” by Chaucer comes to mind.)  It’s also possible to make an important, compelling, and tasteful film in which rape is portrayed.  (Like Lars von Trier’s 2004 film Dogville, starring Nicole Kidman.)  Deadgirl succeeds in being sensational and unnerving, but in little else. 

Full Disclosure: Truth time.  I only watched the first 90% of Deadgirl.  (I had had a long day, and went to bed before it was over.  The next morning, I awoke with zero desire to see the rest of the film.  Instead, I pulled up plot summaries on the internet and read descriptions of the ending.  These descriptions convinced me that not watching the rest of the film had been a very good decision, and that I was clearly a person of great foresight.)  So if you want to split-hairs, please consider this a review of the first 90% of Deadgirl.

One thought on “(Partial) Movie Review: Deadgirl

  1. *nods*

    As I say in a review of my own, my impression of Deadgirl is that it’s a story about boys dealing with growing up, growing into or out of friendships, and being bit by the love bug for the first time. It’s a coming of age story. So how disturbing is it that we arrived at a time and place when rape can be seen, figuratively or literally, as the gateway to manhood?

    I love my horror movies. I’m okay with them being challenging and difficult. The problem with Deadgirl is that it doesn’t seem like it was challenging or difficult for the people making it. Uggh.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: